Laparoscopic Surgery for Sigmoid Colon Cancer in a Patient With a History of Two Renal Transplantations and Peritoneal Dialysis.

The development of transplantation technology has improved the prognosis of transplantation surgery; however, the negative impact of immunosuppressive drugs has increased the number of patients with cancer after transplantation. Recently, minimally invasive surgery has become more common for cancer treatment. We report our experience of performing laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection for a patient with a history of two renal transplantations and peritoneal dialysis. A 42-year-old male patient who developed purpura nephropathy underwent renal transplantation at ages eight and 34 years. He had been on peritoneal dialysis for five years before the second transplantation. The patient was referred to our department with the chief complaint of sudden abdominal pain. After an examination of imaging, we obtained a diagnosis of sigmoid colon cancer. Despite a history of peritoneal dialysis, laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection was successfully performed without complications after confirming that there were no adhesions in the abdominal cavity. The left lower port position had to be adjusted because the transplanted kidney protruded into the left iliac fossa. No postoperative complications and graft loss occurred. In this case, laparoscopic surgery was effective in lowering the risk of damage to the transplanted kidney and safely performing the procedure. The number of colorectal cancer cases in renal transplant patients is expected to increase, and some of these patients will have a history of peritoneal dialysis, which may make surgery more difficult. The successful outcome of this case highlights that laparoscopic surgery could be viable for patients with such a complex medical history.

Preoperative PI-RADS v2.1 Scoring System Improves Risk Classification in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine the prognostic value of Prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2.1 scoring system in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 294 patients who received RP between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed and multiple parameters including PI-RADS v2.1 score were employed to identify predictive factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR). Tumor volume was calculated from prostatectomy specimens. RESULTS: Median age at operation and initial PSA level were 67 years old and 7.68 ng/ml, respectively. 44.9 and 24.8% of patients were diagnosed with PI-RADS score 4 and 5 prior to biopsies, respectively. BCR was observed in 17% of patients and median observation period was 63.43 months. After multivariate analysis, PI-RADS v2.1 score 5 [hazard ratio (HR)=2.24, p=0.0124] was an independent predictive factor of BCR in addition to clinical T stage (≥2c) (HR=2.32, p=0.0093) and biopsy Gleason score (≥8) (HR=2.81, p=0.0007). Furthermore, PI-RADS score 5 significantly stratified the prognosis in D'Amico intermediate- and high-risk groups (p=0.0174 and p=0.0013, respectively). We established novel risk classifications including PI-RADS v2.1 score and found that prognostic capabilities were improved as compared to the D'Amico classification. CONCLUSION: The PI-RADS v2.1 score exhibited significant prognostic value in patients with localized prostate cancer following RP. Risk classifications based on PI-RADS v2.1 score might provide better ability for predicting oncological outcomes as compared to the D'Amico classification system.

Clinical utility of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) based on the serum albumin level and the lymphocyte count has been investigated as a prognostic factor in patients with malignant tumors. However, it has been poorly studied in prostate cancer (PCa), and little is known about its clinical utility. METHODS: Clinical data of 353 patients with de novo, metastatic, hormone-sensitive PCa (mHSPC) who received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were obtained from multiple institutions between 2000 and 2019. The impacts of the pretreatment PNI level on treatment response and survival, together with clinical parameters, were examined. The Mann-Whitney U test, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate significance. RESULTS: The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen level were 73 and 266.18 ng/mL, respectively. Patients with a low PNI had shorter progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, low PNI was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.0027, HR = 1.65), as well as advanced age (p = 0.049, HR = 1.38), the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) 5 (p = 0.0027, HR = 1.69), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (p < 0.0001, HR = 2.08). A propensity score-matching analysis showed that the PNI level remained a significant prognostic biomarker for PFS (p = 0.0263), CSS (p = 0.0006), and OS (p = 0.0015). Furthermore, a novel risk classification using PNI, LDH, and the ISUP GG was established to stratify patients' prognosis. An increase in the number of risk factors was significantly correlated with poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A low pretreatment PNI might be an effective biomarker of poor treatment response and survival in patients with mHSPC undergoing ADT.

Identification of high-risk stage I colon and rectal cancer patients: a retrospective analysis of a large Japanese cohort.

PURPOSE: Data regarding risk factors for recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer patients are limited. The aim of this study was to clarify the existence of a high-recurrence-risk population among stage I colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: This analysis included 7,539 stage I colorectal cancer patients treated between 1997 and 2012 at 24 leading hospitals in Japan. Risk factors for time to recurrence were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model, and a high-risk group for recurrence was identified. Prognostic outcomes of high-risk stage I colorectal cancer patients were compared with those of low-risk stage I and stage II patients. RESULTS: Multivariable analyses identified left-sided location (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-2.58), T2 tumors (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.21-2.66), and lymphatic invasion (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.05-2.28) as risk factors for recurrence in stage I colon cancer, and patients with these three risk factors were classified as high risk. For stage I rectal cancer, patients with poor differentiation (HR: 2.86, 95% CI: 1.21-5.69), T2 tumors (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.23), and venous invasion (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.08-2.13) were identified as high risk. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative recurrence rate and recurrence-free survival revealed that the high-risk stage I colorectal cancer patients have poorer clinical outcomes than the low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Although stage I colorectal cancer patients generally have a favorable prognosis after curative surgery, poorer prognosis was observed in high-risk stage I colorectal cancer patients than in low-risk patients.

Oncologic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: An international retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive local treatment comprising total mesorectal excision (TME) with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has received attention among clinicians treating rectal cancer. It remains unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after intensive local treatment is beneficial for these patients. We evaluated the oncologic benefit of ACT for patients with LARC who received intensive local treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included 737 patients treated in Japan and Korea between 2010 and 2017. The effectiveness of ACT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses to identify subpopulations potentially benefiting from ACT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 49 months; the 5-year RFS and local recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 72.1% and 4.9%, respectively; 514 patients (69.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, without an oncologic benefit (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.68) demonstrated in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. In subgroup analyses, the distributions of the 95% CI in patients aged ≥70 years and those with ypStage 0 tended to place a disproportionate emphasis that favoured the non-ACT treatment strategy. CONCLUSION: Despite achieving good local control with intensive local treatment strategy, the effectiveness of ACT for the LARC patients with CRT followed by TME with selective LPND was not proved. Elderly patients and those with ypStage0 may not receive benefit from ACT after CRT and TME ± LPND.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for left flexure colon cancer: A propensity score matched analysis from an international cohort.

AIM: Surgical treatment of splenic flexure cancer (SFC) still presents some debated issues, including the role of laparoscopic surgery. The literature is based on small single-centre series, while randomized controlled studies comparing open and laparoscopic treatment for colon cancer exclude SFC. This study aimed to determine the role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of SFC, comparing short- and long-term outcomes with open surgery. METHOD: This was an international multicentre retrospective cohort study that analysed patients from 10 tertiary referral centres. From a cohort of 641 cases, 484 patients with Stage I-III SFC submitted to elective surgery with curative intent were selected. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 130 patients in the laparoscopic group (LapGroup) were compared with 130 patients in the open surgery group (OpenGroup). RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the two groups were comparable for demographic and clinical parameters. OpenGroup presented a higher incidence of overall (P = 0.02) and surgery-related complications (P = 0.05) but a similar rate of severe complications (P = 0.75). Length of stay was notably shorter in the LapGroup (P = 0.001). Overall (P = 0.793) as well as cancer-specific survival (P = 0.63) did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elective laparoscopic surgery for Stage I-III SFC is feasible and associated with improved short-term postoperative outcomes compared to open surgery. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery appears to provide excellent long-term cancer outcomes.

Relationship between diverting stoma and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: a nationwide study using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan.

BACKGROUND: Patients at risk of recurrence after curative surgery for rectal cancer usually receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative recovery after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer can be improved by placement of a diverting stoma to reduce anastomotic leakage. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma affects administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients. METHODS: We identified Japanese patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months of surgery in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Doses of five types of chemotherapy administered (tegafur/uracil, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium, capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) were assessed according to the presence or absence of diverting stoma and the timing of stoma closure. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the cumulative doses of chemotherapy administered in the 12 months after LAR between patients with and without diverting stoma, but more doses were administered in the early postoperative period (0-2 months after LAR) in patients without diverting stoma. Also, more doses of chemotherapy, regardless of type, were administered in the late closure group (7-12 months after LAR) than in the early closure (≤ 6 months) and no closure groups. CONCLUSION: Presence of a diverting stoma did not influence the dose of adjuvant chemotherapy administered within 12 months after LAR but could have delayed the start of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with late closure of a diverting stoma received more doses of adjuvant chemotherapy administered over 12 months.

Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Highly Advanced Gastric Cancer: Final Report of a Prospective Phase II Trial (KUGC04).

BACKGROUND: This is the final report evaluating the long-term outcomes of a single-arm phase II clinical trial that demonstrated the short-term efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for highly advanced gastric cancer (AGC) [KUGC04]. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma and diagnosed with clinical stage II or higher, who potentially underwent curative resection between August 2009 and November 2014, were prospectively enrolled. Long-term outcomes with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to clinical or pathological stages. Recurrence and progression patterns were also investigated. These outcomes were compared with those of previous reports to assess the applicability of LG for highly advanced gastric cancer (HAGC). RESULTS: The median observation period of all surviving patients was 75.1 months. The 5-year PFS and 5-year OS of all patients was 47.4% and 54.4%, respectively. Clinical stage-specific 5-year PFS and 5-year OS was 75.0, 69.1, 53.9, 39.4, 40.0 and 9.1, and 75.0, 68.8, 61.5, 45.0, 60.0 and 27.3, respectively, in stages IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV, respectively. Pathological stage-specific 5-year PFS and 5-year OS, including ypStage with preoperative chemotherapy, was 100, 80.0, 100, 62.5, 80.0, 51.3, 16.7, 22.2 and 12.5, and 100, 80.0, 100, 75.0, 80.0, 64.2, 25.0, 33.3 and 12.5, respectively, in stage X (no residual tumor with preoperative chemotherapy), IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, and IV, respectively. Recurrence or progression was observed in 30 patients (41.1%). CONCLUSION: LG for HAGC performed by experienced surgeons is safe and oncologically acceptable.

Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.

AIM: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the gold standard in surgical research, and case-matched studies, such as studies with propensity score matching, are expected to serve as an alternative to RCT. Both study designs have been used to investigate the potential superiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery for rectal cancer, but it remains unclear whether there are any differences in the findings obtained using these study designs. We aimed to examine similarities and differences between findings from different study designs regarding laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analyses. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. RCT, case-matched studies, and cohort studies comparing laparoscopic low anterior resection and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer were included. In total, 8 short-term outcomes and 3 long-term outcomes were assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted stratified by study design using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included in this review. Findings did not differ between RCT and case-matched studies for most outcomes. However, the estimated treatment effect was largest in cohort studies, intermediate in case-matched studies, and smallest in RCT for overall postoperative complications and 3-year local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Findings from case-matched studies were similar to those from RCT in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. However, findings from case-matched studies were sometimes intermediate between those of RCT and unadjusted cohort studies, and case-matched studies and cohort studies have a potential to overestimate the treatment effect compared with RCT.

Clinical-Pathologic Characteristics and Long-term Outcomes of Left Flexure Colonic Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of an International Multicenter Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer seldom presents at the splenic flexure. Small series on left flexure tumors reported a high occurrence of negative prognostic factors called into question as causes of poor prognosis. However, because of the small number of cases, no definite conclusions can be drawn. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical-pathologic characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of left flexure tumors with other colonic locations. DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for tumors at the splenic flexure. Each tumor was paired in a 1 to 1 fashion with a right-sided and sigmoid tumor. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in 10 international centers. PATIENTS: A total of 641 patients with left flexure tumors were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were measured. RESULTS: Left flexure tumors presented more frequently with stenosis (30.5%; p < 0.001), with lesions infiltrating beyond the serosa (21.9%; p = 0.001) and with a high rate of mucinous histology (8.8%; p = 0.001). Looking at long-term prognosis, no differences were observed among the 3 groups, both considering overall and cancer-specific survival. However, left flexure tumors recurred more frequently as peritoneal carcinomatosis (20.6%; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited because of its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: Although left flexure tumors display several negative prognostic factors, they are not characterized by a worse prognosis compared with other colon cancer locations. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B395. CARACTERÍSTICAS CLÍNICO-PATOLÓGICAS Y RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL CÁNCER DE COLON DE ÁNGULO IZQUIERDO: UN ANÁLISIS RETROSPECTIVO DE UNA COHORTE MULTICÉNTRICA INTERNACIONAL: El cáncer colorrectal rara vez se presenta en el ángulo esplénico. Pequeñas series sobre tumores de ángulo izquierdo informaron una alta incidencia de factores pronósticos negativos cuestionados como causas de mal pronóstico. Sin embargo, debido al pequeño número de casos, no se pueden sacar conclusiones definitivas.El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar las características clínico-patológicas, los resultados a corto y largo plazo de los tumores de ángulo izquierdo con otras ubicaciones de colon.Análisis retrospectivo de pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a cirugía por tumores en el ángulo esplénico. Cada tumor se emparejó de forma individual con un tumor del lado derecho y sigmoide.El estudio se realizó en 10 centros internacionales.Se incluyeron en el estudio un total de 641 pacientes con tumores del ángulo izquierdo.Supervivencia general y específica del cáncerLos tumores de ángulo izquierda se presentaron con mayor frecuencia con estenosis (30.5%, p <0.001), con lesiones infiltradas más allá de la serosa (21.9%, p = 0.001), y con una alta tasa de histología mucinosa (8.8%, p = 0.001). En cuanto al pronóstico a largo plazo, no se observaron diferencias entre los tres grupos, considerando la supervivencia general y específica del cáncer. Sin embargo, los tumores de ángulo izquierdo recurrieron con mayor frecuencia como carcinomatosis peritoneal (20,6%; p <0,001).Este estudio fue limitado debido a su naturaleza retrospectiva.Aunque los tumores de ángulo izquierdo muestran varios factores pronósticos negativos, no se caracterizan por un peor pronóstico en comparación con otras ubicaciones de cáncer de colon. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B395.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer has spread globally. The usefulness of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients was initially indicated by comparison with open surgery. However, whether the procedure is safe for elderly as well as non-elderly patients with colorectal cancer remains unclear. METHODS: In this review, patients aged ≥ 75 were defined as elderly. We conducted literature searches using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials. Two authors independently reviewed resultant articles to identify relevant observational studies. Data synthesis was performed with a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated by using forest plots and I2 statistics. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed by the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included. The incidence of overall complications was slightly higher in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients, with statistical significance (risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.34). There was no difference between them in the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.86-1.80) and mortality (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is mostly safe for elderly patients as well as non-elderly patients. Preoperative comorbidities or poor physical capacity should be cared for in the elderly.

Efficacy of Endoscopic Management for Early Remnant Gastric Cancer: Is Completion Gastrectomy Truly Necessary in Cases with Marginally Noncurative Histopathologic Features?

BACKGROUND: For patients with early primary gastric cancer, endoscopic management has become a standard of care. However, its efficacy for early remnant gastric cancer (ERGC) remains controversial and an invasive surgical procedure remains the primary choice of treatment. METHODS: A multi-institutional database of ERGC cases was retrospectively reviewed. Efficacy of endoscopic resection was analyzed by reviewing the clinicopathologic features of patients who underwent endoscopic resection and comparing the long-term outcomes with those of surgical resection. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with ERGC after distal gastrectomy, 80 underwent endoscopic resection and 41 underwent completion gastrectomy (Group S). According to the histopathological criteria, 55 of the 80 endoscopic resection cases were classified as "curative resection" (Group E1) and the remaining 25 were classified as "noncurative resection" (Group E2). Tumor recurrence was observed only in three patients (12%) in Group E2, and no tumor recurrence was confirmed in Group S and Group E1. Multivariate analyses confirmed that completion gastrectomy [hazard ratio (HR), 6.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5-26.3] was associated with poor survival compared with endoscopic resection, and lymphovascular infiltration (HR 9.5; 95% CI 2.5-36.7) was correlated with tumor recurrence. Histopathological positive resection margin, tumor size, or deeper tumor invasion were not correlated with tumor recurrence after endoscopic resection. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic management might be an effective treatment option for ERGC with potential long-term survival advantage over the completion gastrectomy even in cases with histopathological features, suggesting noncurative resection.

[Multimodality Therapy against the Lateral Lymph Node Recurrence of Rectal Cancer].

BACKGROUND: The local recurrence of rectal cancer classifies 4 types, anterior, posterior, lateral compartment and anastomotic site. This study evaluates outcome of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection(LLND)against the lateral lymph node recurrence. METHOD: Five patients were diagnosed as the lateral lymph node recurrence and underwent laparoscopic LLND. We diagnosed the lateral lymph node recurrence by CT, MRI and PET-CT. All cases revealed abnormal uptake on PET-CT. RESULT: The median of age is 63. Three patients are male. About primary tumor, 4 patients had tumor below peritoneal reflection and one patient above it. Two patients received neoadjuvant(chemo)radiotherapy(RT group)and one of them underwent laparoscopic LLND at the first operation. The median period from operation to recurrence was 25 months. Before re-operation, 3 patients received chemotherapy. Pathological assessments confirmed pathological complete response(pCR) in all three cases. The median of operation time and bleeding were 257 min and 0 mL, respectively. No complications, more than Grade III(Clavien-Dindo classification)happened. The median follow-up period from re-operation was 34 months. Four patients have no recurrence and one presents lung metastasis. All 5 patients are alive. CONCLUSION: Laparoscope magnifies various pelvic structures. Therefore we perform operation more exactly and safety. In the case of local recurrence, especially lateral compartment, tumor is easy to invade adjacent structures. Then, it is often difficult to do R0 resection. If we find the recurrence lesions earlier and induce neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we can improve R0 resection rate.

Can laparoscopic appendectomy be safely performed by surgical residents without prior experience of open appendectomy?

BACKGROUND: As laparoscopic surgery has become the mainstream technique for abdominal surgery, it has become difficult for surgical residents to have opportunities to perform open surgery. This study aimed to examine the appropriateness and feasibility of laparoscopic appendectomy performed by surgical trainees who had little experience with open appendectomy or laparoscopic training with animal models. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all the records of patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from April 2008 to December 2014. Residents were assigned to two levels of seniority: junior residents who had undergone 1-3 years of residency and senior residents who had undergone 4-6 years of residency. Patient characteristics, histopathological results, operative time, blood loss, conversion to open procedure, complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 174 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent laparoscopic appendectomy by junior residents and 90 patients were operated on by senior residents. There were no statistical differences in the characteristics of the patients, conversion rates (0/174 vs. 1/90), median operative times (75 minutes vs. 75 minutes), complication rates (7% vs. 4%), and median lengths of hospital stay (4 days vs. 4 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed safely by surgical residents who had little experience or training with animal models or open appendectomy. In this era of laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy represents an important opportunity for training surgical residents with little experience of open surgery.

[A Case of Bilateral Lymph Node Metastases of Rectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy and Surgery].

We present a case of bilateral lymph node metastases of rectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and surgery. The patient was a 65-year-old man with upper rectal cancer. Laparoscopic low anterior resection(LAR)was performed. Pathological findings were tub2>por>muc, pT3, ly2, v3, pN2, pM0. Six months after surgery, the CEA level was elevated. CT and PET-CT confirmed bilateral metastasis to the lymph nodes. Five courses of FOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab were administered, and then, we performed laparoscopic bilateral lymph node dissection. Pathological assessments confirmed scarring and fibrosis, that is, a pathological complete response(pCR)was achieved. Two years and 6 months after surgery, no recurrence was detected. After chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, we should perform surgery to prevent local recurrence, especially to the lateral lymph nodes.

Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

The programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway is a negative feedback pathway that suppresses the activity of T cells. Previous studies reported that high PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) was associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer; however, the prognostic evaluation of these studies was limited because they included patients at various disease stages. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between PD-L1 status in the immune microenvironment and the clinicopathological features of stage III colorectal cancer. Two hundred and thirty-five patients were included in the analysis. PD-L1 expression on TC and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMC) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The median follow-up of thisi study was 52.9 months. A total of 8.1% of stage III colorectal cancer showed high PD-L1 expression on TC and 15.3% showed high PD-L1 expression on TIMC. Patients with high PD-L1 expression on TC had significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) than patients with low expression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.62; P = 0.012). In addition, patients with high PD-L1 expression on TIMC were associated with longer DFS than patients with low expression (HR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.98; P = 0.046). These findings suggest that PD-L1 expression status may be a new predictor of recurrence for stage III colorectal cancer patients and highlight the necessity of evaluating PD-L1 expression on TC and TIMC separately in the tumor microenvironment.

Curative resection for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer using neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX plus panitumumab: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: FOLFOX and panitumumab combined chemotherapy plays an important role for metastatic colorectal cancer. However the usefulness of this regimen for neoadjuvant therapy is unclear. CASE REPORT: A 67-year-old man with abdominal pain and pneumaturia was diagnosed with RAS wild-type sigmoid colon cancer with urinary bladder invasion and colovesical fistulas. Because the cancer was considered to be unresectable, a transverse-loop colostomy was performed. Colonoscopy and computed tomography revealed a marked reduction in the size of the primary tumor after six courses of FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) plus panitumumab. Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and partial cystectomy were then performed. The pathological findings based on the resected specimen showed almost complete replacement of the tumor by fibrous tissue, with only a few degenerated tumor glands persisting in the submucosa. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful and he was doing well, without disease recurrence, after 36 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of a successful curative resection in a patient with initially unresectable, locally advanced colorectal cancer who was treated with FOLFOX4 combined with panitumumab.

Successful laparoscopic ligation for massive chylous ascites after rectal cancer surgery.

A 53-year-old man was readmitted with abdominal distention 2 weeks after undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with para-aortic lymphadenectomy for advanced rectal cancer (T4aN1M0, Stage IIIb). Ultrasound revealed massive ascites, and paracentesis revealed chylous fluid with a markedly elevated triglyceride level (1762 mg/dL). Despite conservative management, the fistula remained on postoperative day 120. On percutaneous lymphangiography, the chylous leakage point was clearly visualized at the para-aortic site, and surgical intervention was planned. The abdominal cavity was carefully explored with laparoscopy, and the lymphatic leakage point was detected at the site of previous lymphadenectomy. Leakage was stopped with direct suture ligation and fibrin glue, and the patient was discharged 2 weeks later with no recurrence of the chylous fistula. Surgical intervention can be effective in select patients with a major chylous fistula that persists despite conservative therapy. When the leakage point is localized and detectable on percutaneous lymphangiography, the laparoscopic approach may be feasible.

Laparoscopic plug removal for femoral nerve colic pain after mesh & plug hernioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernias account for 75% of abdominal wall hernias, with a lifetime risk of 27% in men and 3% in women. Major complications are recurrence, chronic pain, and surgical site infection, but their frequency is low. Few studies have reported a calcified mesh causing neuropathy by chronic compression of the femoral nerve after mesh & plug inguinal hernia repair. This is the first report of laparoscopic plug removal for femoral colic due to femoral nerve irritation cause by a calcified plug after mesh & plug inguinal hernia repair. CASE PRESENTATION: In July 2013, a 53-year-old man presented to our hospital with a chief complaint of colic pain in the left lower limb while walking. The patient had undergone left inguinal hernia repair about 10 years earlier and reported no chronic pain after the operation. Physical examination revealed a colic pain exacerbated by left thigh movement, especially during flexion, but the patient was pain-free at rest and had no sensory loss. Axial computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed that the inward-projecting plug was extremely close to the femoral nerve. Because of the radicular symptoms and the absence of orthopedic and urological disease, we strongly suspected that the neuralgia was associated with the previous hernia operation and advised exploratory laparotomy, which revealed the plug bulging inward into the abdominal cavity. Moreover, the tip of the plug was firmly calcified and compressing the femoral nerve, which lay just beneath the plug, especially during hip flexion. We explanted the plug and his pain resolved after the operation. The patient remains pain free after 20 months of follow up. CONCLUSION: In this study, laparoscopic hernioplasty proved useful for plug removal because laparoscopic instruments can easily grasp perilesional tissue, and laparoscopic approach has the benefit of isolating the plug for removal while preserving the onlay patch, and helpful for restoring peritoneal defects. Laparoscopic plug removal effectively resolved colic pain in the left thigh due to compression of the femoral nerve by a calcified plug.